<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 260 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48450</link>
    <description>Penalty under the settlement framework requires a reasoned finding that the applicant failed to make full and true disclosure or to cooperate; in the absence of such discussion, the penalty portion is unsustainable and must be reconsidered. A separate refusal to waive interest will ordinarily stand where the order contains a specific and reasoned basis for that conclusion and no legal infirmity is shown. The text therefore highlights that each component of a settlement order must be independently supported by reasons and statutory compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 260 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48450</link>
      <description>Penalty under the settlement framework requires a reasoned finding that the applicant failed to make full and true disclosure or to cooperate; in the absence of such discussion, the penalty portion is unsustainable and must be reconsidered. A separate refusal to waive interest will ordinarily stand where the order contains a specific and reasoned basis for that conclusion and no legal infirmity is shown. The text therefore highlights that each component of a settlement order must be independently supported by reasons and statutory compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>