<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 437 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48449</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent&#039;s licence under Regulation 20(2) is permitted only in appropriate cases where immediate action is necessary and an enquiry is pending or contemplated. The power cannot be used merely on allegations of irregularities. Because the appellate authority found that no enquiry was pending or contemplated, the suspension order was held unsustainable, and the appeal was found not to raise any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 437 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48449</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent&#039;s licence under Regulation 20(2) is permitted only in appropriate cases where immediate action is necessary and an enquiry is pending or contemplated. The power cannot be used merely on allegations of irregularities. Because the appellate authority found that no enquiry was pending or contemplated, the suspension order was held unsustainable, and the appeal was found not to raise any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>