<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 436 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48443</link>
    <description>The High Court at Calcutta upheld the authority&#039;s decision regarding duty liability, affirming a shortfall in duty payment of Rs. 8,26,116 for the period from April 1998 to March 1999. The Additional Commissioner was justified in imposing duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal but reduced the penalty to Rs. 2 lacs, finding no substantial question of law. All parties were directed to comply with the order, with provision for an urgent certified copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 436 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48443</link>
      <description>The High Court at Calcutta upheld the authority&#039;s decision regarding duty liability, affirming a shortfall in duty payment of Rs. 8,26,116 for the period from April 1998 to March 1999. The Additional Commissioner was justified in imposing duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal but reduced the penalty to Rs. 2 lacs, finding no substantial question of law. All parties were directed to comply with the order, with provision for an urgent certified copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>