<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782831</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose regarding levy of service tax on alleged post-2009 services linked to sale of materials. The Court noted that taxability per se was not in issue and that whether services were actually rendered after 2009 was a pure question of fact dependent on documentary analysis. HC also relied on the Department&#039;s acceptance, for subsequent years 2013-14 and 2014-15, that no service tax was chargeable on similar transactions. In the absence of any demonstrated perversity or legal error in CESTAT&#039;s findings, the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782831</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose regarding levy of service tax on alleged post-2009 services linked to sale of materials. The Court noted that taxability per se was not in issue and that whether services were actually rendered after 2009 was a pure question of fact dependent on documentary analysis. HC also relied on the Department&#039;s acceptance, for subsequent years 2013-14 and 2014-15, that no service tax was chargeable on similar transactions. In the absence of any demonstrated perversity or legal error in CESTAT&#039;s findings, the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>