<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 376 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782836</link>
    <description>Limitation for filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was stated to begin from the date of pronouncement of the judgment, not from the date the appellant acquired knowledge of the order. On that basis, the appeal was treated as time-barred under Section 61, and there was found to be no sufficient cause to interfere with the dismissal by the NCLAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 376 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782836</link>
      <description>Limitation for filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was stated to begin from the date of pronouncement of the judgment, not from the date the appellant acquired knowledge of the order. On that basis, the appeal was treated as time-barred under Section 61, and there was found to be no sufficient cause to interfere with the dismissal by the NCLAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>