https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to consolidate or expedite proceedings before Debts Recovery Tribunals or to stay personal insolvency proceedings before the NCLT where effective remedies exist under the RDB Act and IBC. Requests for directions within the statutory forums, without challenging a specific tribunal order, should be pursued through the DRT, DRAT or NCLT. Distinct recovery and insolvency frameworks reduce concerns of conflicting adjudications. Bypassing those remedies, failing to diligently pursue tribunal proceedings, and seeking an unsupported transfer may amount to forum shopping and abuse of process, warranting dismissal with costs. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to consolidate or expedite proceedings before Debts Recovery Tribunals or to stay personal insolvency proceedings before the NCLT where effective remedies exist under the RDB Act and IBC. Requests for directions within the statutory forums, without challenging a specific tribunal order, should be pursued through the DRT, DRAT or NCLT. Distinct recovery and insolvency frameworks reduce concerns of conflicting adjudications. Bypassing those remedies, failing to diligently pursue tribunal proceedings, and seeking an unsupported transfer may amount to forum shopping and abuse of process, warranting dismissal with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838