https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to direct consolidation or expedited disposal of matters pending before DRTs or to stay insolvency proceedings before the NCLT where efficacious statutory remedies exist under the RDB Act and the IBC. The article notes that a petition not challenging any specific tribunal order, but seeking reliefs within the competence of specialised forums, is vulnerable to rejection for want of maintainability. It also highlights that conduct suggestive of bypassing the statutory scheme, including forum shopping and lack of diligence before the proper fora, may justify dismissal with costs as an abuse of process. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to direct consolidation or expedited disposal of matters pending before DRTs or to stay insolvency proceedings before the NCLT where efficacious statutory remedies exist under the RDB Act and the IBC. The article notes that a petition not challenging any specific tribunal order, but seeking reliefs within the competence of specialised forums, is vulnerable to rejection for want of maintainability. It also highlights that conduct suggestive of bypassing the statutory scheme, including forum shopping and lack of diligence before the proper fora, may justify dismissal with costs as an abuse of process. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782838