<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 259 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48441</link>
    <description>The court upheld the imposition of penalty and duty liability on a petitioner company for failing to meet post-importation conditions for customs duty exemption under Notification 64/88-Cus. The petitioner&#039;s application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was rejected due to procedural grounds, leading to an adjudication order by the Commissioner. Ultimately, the court directed the petitioner to pay 50% of the duty amount within two weeks, resolving the dispute and closing the case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 259 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48441</link>
      <description>The court upheld the imposition of penalty and duty liability on a petitioner company for failing to meet post-importation conditions for customs duty exemption under Notification 64/88-Cus. The petitioner&#039;s application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was rejected due to procedural grounds, leading to an adjudication order by the Commissioner. Ultimately, the court directed the petitioner to pay 50% of the duty amount within two weeks, resolving the dispute and closing the case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>