<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 416 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782876</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai upheld the AO&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C, holding that a valid satisfaction note existed and that seized material and statements prima facie impacted the assessee&#039;s income; the assessee&#039;s jurisdictional objections were rejected. ITAT further confirmed rejection of books u/s 145 and estimation of profit at 10% of turnover for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. However, it sustained CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of separate disallowances u/s 14A and on sales promotion expenses, holding that once income is estimated, further item-wise disallowances are impermissible. ITAT also affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of deductions u/s 80G for donations to two registered entities, finding no credible evidence of bogus donations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 416 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782876</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai upheld the AO&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C, holding that a valid satisfaction note existed and that seized material and statements prima facie impacted the assessee&#039;s income; the assessee&#039;s jurisdictional objections were rejected. ITAT further confirmed rejection of books u/s 145 and estimation of profit at 10% of turnover for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. However, it sustained CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of separate disallowances u/s 14A and on sales promotion expenses, holding that once income is estimated, further item-wise disallowances are impermissible. ITAT also affirmed CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of deductions u/s 80G for donations to two registered entities, finding no credible evidence of bogus donations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>