<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 433 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48438</link>
    <description>Where alleged diversion of imported coal was said to breach Condition No. (vii) of Notification No. 43/2002-Cus., the High Court treated the interpretation of the notification condition as remaining unsettled because the Revenue&#039;s appeals on that question were already admitted. In that setting, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalties imposed on the employees was not found fit for interference, and the deletion of penalties was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 433 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48438</link>
      <description>Where alleged diversion of imported coal was said to breach Condition No. (vii) of Notification No. 43/2002-Cus., the High Court treated the interpretation of the notification condition as remaining unsettled because the Revenue&#039;s appeals on that question were already admitted. In that setting, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalties imposed on the employees was not found fit for interference, and the deletion of penalties was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>