https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782891 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. It upheld the appellate authority's findings that serious doubts existed regarding the petitioner's declared place of business, noting inconsistent premises details and two rental agreements of different dates for the alleged new premises. The Court held that non-conduct of business from the declared place constituted contravention of Rule 21A of the CGST Rules. Finding no legal infirmity or perversity in the cancellation order or the appellate confirmation, the HC declined to interfere. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782891 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. It upheld the appellate authority's findings that serious doubts existed regarding the petitioner's declared place of business, noting inconsistent premises details and two rental agreements of different dates for the alleged new premises. The Court held that non-conduct of business from the declared place constituted contravention of Rule 21A of the CGST Rules. Finding no legal infirmity or perversity in the cancellation order or the appellate confirmation, the HC declined to interfere. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782891