<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 439 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48436</link>
    <description>The court granted interim relief to the petitioner in a case challenging the denial of benefit under the DFEC scheme exemption for importing Crude Soyabean Oil. The court stayed the execution of the order demanding customs duty, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the duty within two months. This decision reflected a balanced approach, considering conflicting interpretations of relevant circulars and notifications, and ensuring that the rights and contentions of both parties were preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 439 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48436</link>
      <description>The court granted interim relief to the petitioner in a case challenging the denial of benefit under the DFEC scheme exemption for importing Crude Soyabean Oil. The court stayed the execution of the order demanding customs duty, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the duty within two months. This decision reflected a balanced approach, considering conflicting interpretations of relevant circulars and notifications, and ensuring that the rights and contentions of both parties were preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>