<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 440 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782900</link>
    <description>HC set aside the appellate authority&#039;s order dismissing the registered person&#039;s appeal under s.74 WBGST/CGST Acts for non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit under s.107(6). HC held that, as more than 10% of the disputed tax had already been recovered by the department and the GST Appellate Tribunal is not yet functional, the statutory pre-deposit requirement stood satisfied. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority to hear and decide the appeal on merits without insisting on any further pre-deposit. HC declined to order refund of the amount already recovered, noting the belated approach to the writ jurisdiction. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:12:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 440 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782900</link>
      <description>HC set aside the appellate authority&#039;s order dismissing the registered person&#039;s appeal under s.74 WBGST/CGST Acts for non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit under s.107(6). HC held that, as more than 10% of the disputed tax had already been recovered by the department and the GST Appellate Tribunal is not yet functional, the statutory pre-deposit requirement stood satisfied. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority to hear and decide the appeal on merits without insisting on any further pre-deposit. HC declined to order refund of the amount already recovered, noting the belated approach to the writ jurisdiction. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>