<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 362 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48432</link>
    <description>Concealment and attempted unauthorised removal of dutiable RAM cards from a customs area constituted smuggling for preventive detention purposes because the conduct rendered the goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. The conduct was not limited to abetment or facilitation, supporting detention on the ground of smuggling. Termination of courier employment did not by itself negate the likelihood of future prejudicial activity where the organised nature of the operation and the individual&#039;s role supported a continuing risk through fresh access or other means. The detention order was sustained and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 362 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48432</link>
      <description>Concealment and attempted unauthorised removal of dutiable RAM cards from a customs area constituted smuggling for preventive detention purposes because the conduct rendered the goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. The conduct was not limited to abetment or facilitation, supporting detention on the ground of smuggling. Termination of courier employment did not by itself negate the likelihood of future prejudicial activity where the organised nature of the operation and the individual&#039;s role supported a continuing risk through fresh access or other means. The detention order was sustained and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>