https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465065 The dispute was held to be referable to arbitration under the depository bye-laws, but the appellant's earlier request was not submitted in the prescribed format required by the bye-laws. The proper course was to file a fresh claim in the prescribed format under clause 22.6.1.1, after which the concerned respondent was to commence arbitration and decide the matter in accordance with law, with an opportunity of hearing, within the time fixed by the order. The operative effect was that arbitration could proceed only upon compliance with the prescribed procedural format. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Dec 2025 17:59:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465065 The dispute was held to be referable to arbitration under the depository bye-laws, but the appellant's earlier request was not submitted in the prescribed format required by the bye-laws. The proper course was to file a fresh claim in the prescribed format under clause 22.6.1.1, after which the concerned respondent was to commence arbitration and decide the matter in accordance with law, with an opportunity of hearing, within the time fixed by the order. The operative effect was that arbitration could proceed only upon compliance with the prescribed procedural format. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465065