<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465071</link>
    <description>Gun-shaped metal cigarette lighters, where freely importable under the relevant import policy, cannot be treated as prohibited goods merely because they resemble weapons. Section 111(d) of the Customs Act applies only to imports prohibited by law in force, and Section 111(m) requires a mismatch with declared particulars or value; neither basis was made out here. The supposed reliance on a non-existent &quot;Weapons Act, 1990&quot; and on the Arms Rules definition of firearm replica was insufficient because the goods remained functional lighters and were not shown to be indistinguishable from real firearms. Confiscation and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 18:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1289 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465071</link>
      <description>Gun-shaped metal cigarette lighters, where freely importable under the relevant import policy, cannot be treated as prohibited goods merely because they resemble weapons. Section 111(d) of the Customs Act applies only to imports prohibited by law in force, and Section 111(m) requires a mismatch with declared particulars or value; neither basis was made out here. The supposed reliance on a non-existent &quot;Weapons Act, 1990&quot; and on the Arms Rules definition of firearm replica was insufficient because the goods remained functional lighters and were not shown to be indistinguishable from real firearms. Confiscation and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>