https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48424 The High Court declined to grant installments for dues payment after a Settlement Commission order, citing the absence of such provision in the Commission's order and legislative changes. The court emphasized the finality of the Commission's order, noting the lack of statutory authority for installment payments post the legislative amendment. The court highlighted the importance of settlement terms under Section 32F(8) and the Finance Bill's stipulations on settlement conditions and payment timelines. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed without costs, upholding the Settlement Commission's order's conclusive nature and the legislative intent regarding installment payment exclusions. en-us Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48424 The High Court declined to grant installments for dues payment after a Settlement Commission order, citing the absence of such provision in the Commission's order and legislative changes. The court emphasized the finality of the Commission's order, noting the lack of statutory authority for installment payments post the legislative amendment. The court highlighted the importance of settlement terms under Section 32F(8) and the Finance Bill's stipulations on settlement conditions and payment timelines. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed without costs, upholding the Settlement Commission's order's conclusive nature and the legislative intent regarding installment payment exclusions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48424