<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal by Food Corporation of India (FCI), directing the High Court to reconsider and answer the first question referred by the Sales Tax Tribunal after affording an opportunity to both parties. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual basis in legal determinations and the obligation of the High Court to address questions referred by lower authorities in compliance with specific directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal by Food Corporation of India (FCI), directing the High Court to reconsider and answer the first question referred by the Sales Tax Tribunal after affording an opportunity to both parties. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual basis in legal determinations and the obligation of the High Court to address questions referred by lower authorities in compliance with specific directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>