<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</link>
    <description>Where a reference is made in compliance with a specific judicial direction and the record already contains sufficient factual material, the High Court must answer the referred question on merits. The assessment and appellate orders contained details of incidental expenses, including market fee, dami and labour charges, and their treatment in taxable turnover, so the High Court should not have declined to decide the first question on the ground that no factual basis existed. The proper course was to hear both sides and determine the reference on merits. The matter therefore required reconsideration and decision on the substantive issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</link>
      <description>Where a reference is made in compliance with a specific judicial direction and the record already contains sufficient factual material, the High Court must answer the referred question on merits. The assessment and appellate orders contained details of incidental expenses, including market fee, dami and labour charges, and their treatment in taxable turnover, so the High Court should not have declined to decide the first question on the ground that no factual basis existed. The proper course was to hear both sides and determine the reference on merits. The matter therefore required reconsideration and decision on the substantive issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>