<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1325 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465057</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of TP adjustments where the TPO had determined the arm&#039;s length price of management and licence/royalty fees at nil. It accepted aggregation of these transactions under TNMM and found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on the TPO&#039;s report confirming the margins. On the disallowance under sections 36(1)(va)/43B for delayed remittance of employees&#039; PF/ESI contributions, the ITAT held that contributions paid before the due date of filing the return are allowable as deduction. As the assessee had remitted the employees&#039; contribution before the return due date, the disallowance was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 10:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1325 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465057</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of TP adjustments where the TPO had determined the arm&#039;s length price of management and licence/royalty fees at nil. It accepted aggregation of these transactions under TNMM and found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on the TPO&#039;s report confirming the margins. On the disallowance under sections 36(1)(va)/43B for delayed remittance of employees&#039; PF/ESI contributions, the ITAT held that contributions paid before the due date of filing the return are allowable as deduction. As the assessee had remitted the employees&#039; contribution before the return due date, the disallowance was deleted. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>