<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48407</link>
    <description>A dispute concerning duty on capital goods after long use and sale as scrap was not decided on the substantive excise issue. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had taken differing views on the same question in earlier matters and that the assessee had remained unrepresented before the Tribunal. In those circumstances, fairness required that the Revenue&#039;s appeal be heard afresh on merits after notice to both sides. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48407</link>
      <description>A dispute concerning duty on capital goods after long use and sale as scrap was not decided on the substantive excise issue. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had taken differing views on the same question in earlier matters and that the assessee had remained unrepresented before the Tribunal. In those circumstances, fairness required that the Revenue&#039;s appeal be heard afresh on merits after notice to both sides. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>