<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48406</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed an appeal related to alleged clandestine removal of goods due to inability to serve notice. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate order based on a Supreme Court ruling on brand name issues. Respondent had sufficient credit, indicating no duty evasion. The appeal was dismissed without re-serving notice to respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48406</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed an appeal related to alleged clandestine removal of goods due to inability to serve notice. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate order based on a Supreme Court ruling on brand name issues. Respondent had sufficient credit, indicating no duty evasion. The appeal was dismissed without re-serving notice to respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>