<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48396</link>
    <description>Interim relief was refused in a challenge to demurrage liability, as the HC noted that the Port Trust was prima facie entitled to recover demurrage for goods stored on its premises. The remission policy for importers did not, at that stage, create any corresponding entitlement for exporters, and the scope of general policy powers was left for examination at the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48396</link>
      <description>Interim relief was refused in a challenge to demurrage liability, as the HC noted that the Port Trust was prima facie entitled to recover demurrage for goods stored on its premises. The remission policy for importers did not, at that stage, create any corresponding entitlement for exporters, and the scope of general policy powers was left for examination at the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>