<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nearness and Farness of IPR Laws in the Age of Advanced Technologies (AI, ML, DL, Big Data &amp; Beyond).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15539</link>
    <description>Existing IP doctrines remain applicable where human intellectual choice or technical contribution persists: copyright protects human-directed works produced with AI assistance; patents cover AI-enabled inventions that satisfy inventive step and industrial applicability; trade secrets can protect proprietary datasets and models given reasonable secrecy measures; and trademark law continues to address brand misuse in digital markets. However, significant doctrinal gaps exist concerning AI authorship and inventorship, mass data ingestion and database rights, patent eligibility for ML models, ownership of autonomous outputs, and territorial enforcement challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Nearness and Farness of IPR Laws in the Age of Advanced Technologies (AI, ML, DL, Big Data &amp; Beyond).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15539</link>
      <description>Existing IP doctrines remain applicable where human intellectual choice or technical contribution persists: copyright protects human-directed works produced with AI assistance; patents cover AI-enabled inventions that satisfy inventive step and industrial applicability; trade secrets can protect proprietary datasets and models given reasonable secrecy measures; and trademark law continues to address brand misuse in digital markets. However, significant doctrinal gaps exist concerning AI authorship and inventorship, mass data ingestion and database rights, patent eligibility for ML models, ownership of autonomous outputs, and territorial enforcement challenges.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>