https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48392 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 within eight weeks. The Court determined that the petitioner's case should be considered under Section 95(ii)(b) of the Finance Act, as opposed to Section 95(ii)(c) as argued by the Commissioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48392 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to evaluate the petitioner's declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 within eight weeks. The Court determined that the petitioner's case should be considered under Section 95(ii)(b) of the Finance Act, as opposed to Section 95(ii)(c) as argued by the Commissioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48392