https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48391 The Supreme Court clarified the definitions of "arrest" and "custody" in criminal proceedings, emphasizing submission to the court's jurisdiction and physical presence. Regarding non-disclosure of criminal cases in recruitment applications, the Court found divergent views in the High Court but ultimately ruled in favor of the appellants, directing their appointment as Constable-Drivers in the Haryana Police. The Court granted them notional benefits from the date of judgment and ordered the issuance of appointment letters, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48391 The Supreme Court clarified the definitions of "arrest" and "custody" in criminal proceedings, emphasizing submission to the court's jurisdiction and physical presence. Regarding non-disclosure of criminal cases in recruitment applications, the Court found divergent views in the High Court but ultimately ruled in favor of the appellants, directing their appointment as Constable-Drivers in the Haryana Police. The Court granted them notional benefits from the date of judgment and ordered the issuance of appointment letters, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48391