https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782686 A discharge order under Section 227 CrPC was set aside because it was largely a reproduction of the parties' rival stands and did not show real judicial scrutiny of the prosecution material. In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the trial court was required to apply its mind to the foundational facts, the alleged proceeds of crime, and whether sufficient ground existed to proceed; the cryptic order failed to do so and was therefore treated as perverse and unsustainable in revision. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any finding on the merits of the prosecution case. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782686 A discharge order under Section 227 CrPC was set aside because it was largely a reproduction of the parties' rival stands and did not show real judicial scrutiny of the prosecution material. In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the trial court was required to apply its mind to the foundational facts, the alleged proceeds of crime, and whether sufficient ground existed to proceed; the cryptic order failed to do so and was therefore treated as perverse and unsustainable in revision. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any finding on the merits of the prosecution case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782686