https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782693 NCLAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation and rejected the application for condonation of delay. It held that, under s.61(2) IBC, the limitation period is to be computed from the date of uploading of the impugned NCLT order on the Tribunal's website, not from the date of receipt of the certified copy, in the facts of this case. The impugned order was uploaded on 23.09.2024, while the appeal was e-filed on 25.11.2024, resulting in a delay of about 62 days, beyond the maximum condonable period of 45 days. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for delay and held the appellant responsible for inaction. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782693 NCLAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation and rejected the application for condonation of delay. It held that, under s.61(2) IBC, the limitation period is to be computed from the date of uploading of the impugned NCLT order on the Tribunal's website, not from the date of receipt of the certified copy, in the facts of this case. The impugned order was uploaded on 23.09.2024, while the appeal was e-filed on 25.11.2024, resulting in a delay of about 62 days, beyond the maximum condonable period of 45 days. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for delay and held the appellant responsible for inaction. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782693