https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782698 The NCLAT allowed the appeal against the order entertaining the respondent's contempt application alleging disobedience of an earlier direction to pay 20% of the cheque amount. Recording the appellant's statement that the directed 20% amount had been paid, the Tribunal held that, in the present circumstances, the contempt proceedings need not continue and set aside the impugned order. The respondent was granted liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, including contempt, in future if warranted by subsequent events. The NCLAT expressly refrained from adjudicating on the merits of the underlying claims. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782698 The NCLAT allowed the appeal against the order entertaining the respondent's contempt application alleging disobedience of an earlier direction to pay 20% of the cheque amount. Recording the appellant's statement that the directed 20% amount had been paid, the Tribunal held that, in the present circumstances, the contempt proceedings need not continue and set aside the impugned order. The respondent was granted liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, including contempt, in future if warranted by subsequent events. The NCLAT expressly refrained from adjudicating on the merits of the underlying claims. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782698