<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48386</link>
    <description>The case involved the non-payment of duty and penalty by respondent No. 2, Tonira Pharma Ltd., as per the Tribunal&#039;s order. The petitioners, Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat-II, and Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Division-I, Ankleshwar, were willing to pay any outstanding amount if needed. The High Court directed that the Tribunal should not consider Tonira Pharma Ltd.&#039;s stay application unless the company paid the duty and penalty as ordered. Compliance with tribunal orders and court undertakings was highlighted, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling financial obligations directed by legal authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48386</link>
      <description>The case involved the non-payment of duty and penalty by respondent No. 2, Tonira Pharma Ltd., as per the Tribunal&#039;s order. The petitioners, Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat-II, and Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Division-I, Ankleshwar, were willing to pay any outstanding amount if needed. The High Court directed that the Tribunal should not consider Tonira Pharma Ltd.&#039;s stay application unless the company paid the duty and penalty as ordered. Compliance with tribunal orders and court undertakings was highlighted, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling financial obligations directed by legal authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>