<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 251 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782711</link>
    <description>Crude rice bran oil imported with high acid content was treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because the governing test was the oil&#039;s edible-grade character and its intended edible use after refining, not the acid value at import. The analysis relied on the Customs Tariff Chapter 15 note, food standards regulations, and Board circulars, and concluded that denial of exemption was not justified. On limitation, the extended period based on alleged suppression was held unsustainable because the bills of entry and related assessments were filed on record and no reliable material showed deliberate non-disclosure. The duty demand was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 251 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782711</link>
      <description>Crude rice bran oil imported with high acid content was treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because the governing test was the oil&#039;s edible-grade character and its intended edible use after refining, not the acid value at import. The analysis relied on the Customs Tariff Chapter 15 note, food standards regulations, and Board circulars, and concluded that denial of exemption was not justified. On limitation, the extended period based on alleged suppression was held unsustainable because the bills of entry and related assessments were filed on record and no reliable material showed deliberate non-disclosure. The duty demand was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>