<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782731</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi-AT held that for purposes of s.153C, the &quot;date of search&quot; for a non-searched person is the date on which the AO of such person records satisfaction and receives seized material pertaining to that person. Applying this principle, the satisfaction was recorded on 24.06.2022, making AY 2023-24 the relevant year and restricting the block period to AYs 2014-15 to 2023-24. Since the impugned assessments related to AYs 2010-11 to 2013-14, they fell outside the permissible block of ten years. Consequently, the AO lacked valid jurisdiction under s.153C. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order and quashed the impugned assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782731</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi-AT held that for purposes of s.153C, the &quot;date of search&quot; for a non-searched person is the date on which the AO of such person records satisfaction and receives seized material pertaining to that person. Applying this principle, the satisfaction was recorded on 24.06.2022, making AY 2023-24 the relevant year and restricting the block period to AYs 2014-15 to 2023-24. Since the impugned assessments related to AYs 2010-11 to 2013-14, they fell outside the permissible block of ten years. Consequently, the AO lacked valid jurisdiction under s.153C. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order and quashed the impugned assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>