https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48382 The High Court of Bombay addressed a procedural irregularity in an appeal where the authorization was signed by a Commissioner holding additional charge. The Court emphasized that procedural issues should not impede justice and that parties should be allowed to rectify defects. The Court set aside the order, restored the appeal for a full hearing on merits, and disposed of related matters. This decision underscores the importance of ensuring that procedural defects do not hinder the administration of justice and highlights the commitment to fairness and due process in legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Nov 2018 08:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48382 The High Court of Bombay addressed a procedural irregularity in an appeal where the authorization was signed by a Commissioner holding additional charge. The Court emphasized that procedural issues should not impede justice and that parties should be allowed to rectify defects. The Court set aside the order, restored the appeal for a full hearing on merits, and disposed of related matters. This decision underscores the importance of ensuring that procedural defects do not hinder the administration of justice and highlights the commitment to fairness and due process in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48382