<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 283 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782743</link>
    <description>Where a fresh assessment under section 143(3) read with section 254 accepted the returned income and made no addition, penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars could not survive because the statutory basis of tax sought to be evaded disappeared. The penalty was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 283 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782743</link>
      <description>Where a fresh assessment under section 143(3) read with section 254 accepted the returned income and made no addition, penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars could not survive because the statutory basis of tax sought to be evaded disappeared. The penalty was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>