<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 286 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782746</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were invalid where the basis for reopening was information unearthed during a search u/s 132 conducted at the premises of a third party. It ruled that, in such circumstances, the proper statutory route was u/s 153C, not u/s 147. As the AO had admittedly relied on search material from the third party to reopen the assessment, the initiation of proceedings u/s 147 was found to be contrary to law. The reassessment was quashed, and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:37:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 286 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782746</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were invalid where the basis for reopening was information unearthed during a search u/s 132 conducted at the premises of a third party. It ruled that, in such circumstances, the proper statutory route was u/s 153C, not u/s 147. As the AO had admittedly relied on search material from the third party to reopen the assessment, the initiation of proceedings u/s 147 was found to be contrary to law. The reassessment was quashed, and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>