<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 289 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782749</link>
    <description>Excess dividend distribution tax under section 115-O was not refundable where the claim relied on applying the India-Slovenia DTAA through its Most Favoured Nation clause. The governing Special Bench ruling in Dy. CIT v. Total Oil India P. Ltd. was treated as dispositive of both issues, resulting in rejection of the refund claim and the plea for DTAA-based relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 289 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782749</link>
      <description>Excess dividend distribution tax under section 115-O was not refundable where the claim relied on applying the India-Slovenia DTAA through its Most Favoured Nation clause. The governing Special Bench ruling in Dy. CIT v. Total Oil India P. Ltd. was treated as dispositive of both issues, resulting in rejection of the refund claim and the plea for DTAA-based relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>