<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48381</link>
    <description>The High Court treated the authorization issue as curable because the Committee constituted under the relevant notification had examined the records and decided to file the appeal under section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As the Tribunal had not considered the authorization document earlier, the objection was not treated as an incurable defect. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration to do complete justice between the parties, and the appeal was allowed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48381</link>
      <description>The High Court treated the authorization issue as curable because the Committee constituted under the relevant notification had examined the records and decided to file the appeal under section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As the Tribunal had not considered the authorization document earlier, the objection was not treated as an incurable defect. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration to do complete justice between the parties, and the appeal was allowed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>