<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 291 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782751</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and quashed the assessments for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 144/143(3). It held that the AO acted without proper jurisdiction amid parallel and confused transfers of the case, violated principles of natural justice by giving virtually no opportunity to be heard, and completed assessment within two days of filing of return. The approval u/s 153D by the JCIT was found mechanical and without application of mind, rendering the assessments non est in law. Absence of notice u/s 143(2) for AY 2014-15 further invalidated the proceedings. Additions on merits were left unadjudicated as academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 291 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782751</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and quashed the assessments for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 144/143(3). It held that the AO acted without proper jurisdiction amid parallel and confused transfers of the case, violated principles of natural justice by giving virtually no opportunity to be heard, and completed assessment within two days of filing of return. The approval u/s 153D by the JCIT was found mechanical and without application of mind, rendering the assessments non est in law. Absence of notice u/s 143(2) for AY 2014-15 further invalidated the proceedings. Additions on merits were left unadjudicated as academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>