<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 428 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48379</link>
    <description>The court held that grinding media balls are eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A as component parts used in the manufacturing process. The failure to file a declaration under Rule 57G was addressed by a penalty imposed, and Modvat credit could not be denied on this basis. The judgment emphasized that minor procedural lapses should not lead to the denial of substantive benefits like Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 428 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48379</link>
      <description>The court held that grinding media balls are eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A as component parts used in the manufacturing process. The failure to file a declaration under Rule 57G was addressed by a penalty imposed, and Modvat credit could not be denied on this basis. The judgment emphasized that minor procedural lapses should not lead to the denial of substantive benefits like Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>