https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465035 The Telangana High Court applied the principle that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as a later special law with an overriding clause, prevails over an inconsistent earlier State enactment. It also treated the hotel project as falling outside the State law's real estate protection and held that the restriction on substitution of the lead developer did not apply on the facts. Because the dispute involved contested factual issues and pending insolvency proceedings before the NCLT/NCLAT, the Court found writ jurisdiction under Article 226 inappropriate and declined the relief sought. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:19:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465035 The Telangana High Court applied the principle that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as a later special law with an overriding clause, prevails over an inconsistent earlier State enactment. It also treated the hotel project as falling outside the State law's real estate protection and held that the restriction on substitution of the lead developer did not apply on the facts. Because the dispute involved contested factual issues and pending insolvency proceedings before the NCLT/NCLAT, the Court found writ jurisdiction under Article 226 inappropriate and declined the relief sought. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465035