https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465038 CESTAT Bangalore set aside the impugned order involving alleged clandestine removal of imported gold by a SEZ unit. Relying on consistent precedent, the Tribunal held that authorities exercising powers under the Customs Act lack jurisdiction over units operating within a SEZ for the purposes of raising such demands and imposing penalties. Consequently, all duty demands, confiscation orders, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants were quashed. The appeals were allowed in toto, with the Tribunal reaffirming the jurisdictional bar against Customs authorities in the SEZ context. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 21:24:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465038 CESTAT Bangalore set aside the impugned order involving alleged clandestine removal of imported gold by a SEZ unit. Relying on consistent precedent, the Tribunal held that authorities exercising powers under the Customs Act lack jurisdiction over units operating within a SEZ for the purposes of raising such demands and imposing penalties. Consequently, all duty demands, confiscation orders, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants were quashed. The appeals were allowed in toto, with the Tribunal reaffirming the jurisdictional bar against Customs authorities in the SEZ context. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465038