<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48370</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the misdeclaration of description and value could constitute smuggling under the Customs Act. It questioned the High Court&#039;s decision to unconditionally release the seized currency, emphasizing the need for due process and caution in handling potentially confiscatable items pending adjudication. The Court stayed the High Court&#039;s judgment, allowing further proceedings post-adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48370</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the misdeclaration of description and value could constitute smuggling under the Customs Act. It questioned the High Court&#039;s decision to unconditionally release the seized currency, emphasizing the need for due process and caution in handling potentially confiscatable items pending adjudication. The Court stayed the High Court&#039;s judgment, allowing further proceedings post-adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>