<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 425 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48367</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings may be quashed where the record contains no specific material connecting the accused with the alleged offence and the case rests only on general assertions of conspiracy. The text notes that the applicant was not named in the FIR, the seized packet remained sealed, and the departmental procedural safeguards were not followed, so the stage of any tampering could not be fixed to him. In those circumstances, continuation of the prosecution was treated as an abuse of process because the prospect of conviction was considered remote.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 425 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48367</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings may be quashed where the record contains no specific material connecting the accused with the alleged offence and the case rests only on general assertions of conspiracy. The text notes that the applicant was not named in the FIR, the seized packet remained sealed, and the departmental procedural safeguards were not followed, so the stage of any tampering could not be fixed to him. In those circumstances, continuation of the prosecution was treated as an abuse of process because the prospect of conviction was considered remote.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>