<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 385 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48366</link>
    <description>The court granted condonation of delay of 323 days in filing a Tax Appeal against the CESTAT order. The delay was attributed to pursuing a Special Civil Application challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found the applicant had shown sufficient cause for the delay and decided to allow the condonation. This case emphasizes the importance of demonstrating reasons for delays in legal proceedings and following prescribed procedures and timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 385 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48366</link>
      <description>The court granted condonation of delay of 323 days in filing a Tax Appeal against the CESTAT order. The delay was attributed to pursuing a Special Civil Application challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found the applicant had shown sufficient cause for the delay and decided to allow the condonation. This case emphasizes the importance of demonstrating reasons for delays in legal proceedings and following prescribed procedures and timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>