<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 409 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48364</link>
    <description>Penalty, confiscation and redemption fine under the Central Excise Act could not be sustained by invoking Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties Act. The High Court noted that the issue was already covered by earlier Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court decisions, and held that the Central Excise Act and Rules could not be applied in the manner attempted to justify such levy. The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:00:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 409 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48364</link>
      <description>Penalty, confiscation and redemption fine under the Central Excise Act could not be sustained by invoking Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties Act. The High Court noted that the issue was already covered by earlier Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court decisions, and held that the Central Excise Act and Rules could not be applied in the manner attempted to justify such levy. The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>