https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48361 Retrospective insertion of the validating provision in the Central Excise Act, 1944 cured the objection that a show cause notice issued under Rule 57U(2) lacked a saving clause after substitution of the rule. Pending proceedings were covered by Section 38A, so the challenge to the notice no longer survived and the petition was rejected. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48361 Retrospective insertion of the validating provision in the Central Excise Act, 1944 cured the objection that a show cause notice issued under Rule 57U(2) lacked a saving clause after substitution of the rule. Pending proceedings were covered by Section 38A, so the challenge to the notice no longer survived and the petition was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48361