<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment Notice Under Sections 148 and 148A Quashed as Time-Barred Applying Surviving Period Doctrine and TOLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94700</link>
    <description>HC examined reassessment proceedings initiated under ss. 148 and 148A (new regime) in light of the SC ruling in Rajeev Bansal and the effect of TOLA and Ashish Agarwal. Applying the &quot;surviving period&quot; doctrine, HC held that, after excluding the periods mandated by SC for deemed stay and for assessee&#039;s reply, only one day remained for completion of s.148A(d) proceedings and issuance of a valid s.148 notice, which expired on 9.06.2022. The impugned notice dated 25.07.2022 was therefore held to be time-barred. HC rejected Revenue&#039;s contention that non-filing of reply extinguished limitation, and quashed the reassessment notice and consequent proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment Notice Under Sections 148 and 148A Quashed as Time-Barred Applying Surviving Period Doctrine and TOLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94700</link>
      <description>HC examined reassessment proceedings initiated under ss. 148 and 148A (new regime) in light of the SC ruling in Rajeev Bansal and the effect of TOLA and Ashish Agarwal. Applying the &quot;surviving period&quot; doctrine, HC held that, after excluding the periods mandated by SC for deemed stay and for assessee&#039;s reply, only one day remained for completion of s.148A(d) proceedings and issuance of a valid s.148 notice, which expired on 9.06.2022. The impugned notice dated 25.07.2022 was therefore held to be time-barred. HC rejected Revenue&#039;s contention that non-filing of reply extinguished limitation, and quashed the reassessment notice and consequent proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>