<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund denied as self-assessed customs duty unchallenged; belated amendment under Section 149 rejected for missing contemporaneous documents</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94687</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the appeal of the importer seeking refund of excess customs duty paid on imported components. Relying on the SC ruling in ITC Ltd (LB), the Tribunal held that self-assessment under the Customs Act constitutes an appealable assessment order, and since the appellant did not challenge its self-assessment within the prescribed period, the claim for refund was not maintainable. The Tribunal further held that the conditions of Section 149 for amendment of documents were not satisfied because the relied-upon documents did not exist at the time of clearance, and belated amendment would undermine the statutory appeal mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund denied as self-assessed customs duty unchallenged; belated amendment under Section 149 rejected for missing contemporaneous documents</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94687</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the appeal of the importer seeking refund of excess customs duty paid on imported components. Relying on the SC ruling in ITC Ltd (LB), the Tribunal held that self-assessment under the Customs Act constitutes an appealable assessment order, and since the appellant did not challenge its self-assessment within the prescribed period, the claim for refund was not maintainable. The Tribunal further held that the conditions of Section 149 for amendment of documents were not satisfied because the relied-upon documents did not exist at the time of clearance, and belated amendment would undermine the statutory appeal mechanism.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>