<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 218 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48354</link>
    <description>The court modified the Customs Authorities&#039; order, allowing the provisional release of goods with a 10% bank guarantee and a bond for the full value, instead of the initially required 25% bank guarantee. The court refrained from delving into the merits of the case due to the pending main issue to avoid prejudice. The decision was influenced by the petitioners&#039; financial constraints and the department&#039;s fluctuating opinion on the goods&#039; value. The judgment demonstrates the court&#039;s careful balancing of interests, ensuring provisional release while considering the petitioners&#039; circumstances. Both petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 218 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48354</link>
      <description>The court modified the Customs Authorities&#039; order, allowing the provisional release of goods with a 10% bank guarantee and a bond for the full value, instead of the initially required 25% bank guarantee. The court refrained from delving into the merits of the case due to the pending main issue to avoid prejudice. The decision was influenced by the petitioners&#039; financial constraints and the department&#039;s fluctuating opinion on the goods&#039; value. The judgment demonstrates the court&#039;s careful balancing of interests, ensuring provisional release while considering the petitioners&#039; circumstances. Both petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>