https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782570 Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules preserves only a narrow inherent power to recall orders in limited situations such as jurisdictional defect, absence of notice, fraud, collusion, or an apparent procedural error. It does not confer a power of review or permit re-opening of a matter already decided on merits. Because the appellant had participated in the proceedings and the recall application sought to revisit the merits of the earlier order, the application was outside the scope of recall jurisdiction and was not maintainable. The rejection of the recall request was therefore justified and required no interference. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782570 Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules preserves only a narrow inherent power to recall orders in limited situations such as jurisdictional defect, absence of notice, fraud, collusion, or an apparent procedural error. It does not confer a power of review or permit re-opening of a matter already decided on merits. Because the appellant had participated in the proceedings and the recall application sought to revisit the merits of the earlier order, the application was outside the scope of recall jurisdiction and was not maintainable. The rejection of the recall request was therefore justified and required no interference. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782570