https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48352 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision regarding the respondent's mistaken credit availment of Basic Customs Duty, noting the absence of intentional wrongful behavior or mala fide intention. Despite the appellant's challenge, no evidence supported intentional wrongdoing. The Court found the respondent's rectification of the mistake and substantial credit balance indicative of a bona fide error. Concluding that no legal errors warranted interference, the High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's decision as based on factual findings without raising any substantial legal questions. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48352 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision regarding the respondent's mistaken credit availment of Basic Customs Duty, noting the absence of intentional wrongful behavior or mala fide intention. Despite the appellant's challenge, no evidence supported intentional wrongdoing. The Court found the respondent's rectification of the mistake and substantial credit balance indicative of a bona fide error. Concluding that no legal errors warranted interference, the High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's decision as based on factual findings without raising any substantial legal questions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48352