<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 129 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782589</link>
    <description>CESTAT (Allahabad) dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order setting aside confiscation of foreign-marked gold bars, silver bullion and currency under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the respondents produced purchase invoices, stock records, GST payments and a CA certificate demonstrating legitimate acquisition and proper accounting of the seized bullion. Revenue failed to rebut this documentary evidence or to discharge the burden under Section 123. Confiscation of silver bullion was rejected as it was duly recorded in books. Confiscation of currency was also set aside, there being no evidence that it represented sale proceeds of smuggled bullion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 129 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782589</link>
      <description>CESTAT (Allahabad) dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order setting aside confiscation of foreign-marked gold bars, silver bullion and currency under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the respondents produced purchase invoices, stock records, GST payments and a CA certificate demonstrating legitimate acquisition and proper accounting of the seized bullion. Revenue failed to rebut this documentary evidence or to discharge the burden under Section 123. Confiscation of silver bullion was rejected as it was duly recorded in books. Confiscation of currency was also set aside, there being no evidence that it represented sale proceeds of smuggled bullion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>